I’m a fan of dual time-line stories but suspect that these are far trickier to pull off than the big hits in the genre suggest, I have read my fill of poor imitations where the connections between past and present are weak or worse still, contrived. Books where all too often, one of the stories shores up the other to such an extent that you feel it was only invented to appeal to those of us who enjoy this form of storytelling. The House of Birds is not one of these poor imitations, better still the story in the present is about a man, Oliver who has walked out of his highly paid job and is ‘considering his options!’
Oliver met Kate when he was a twelve-year-old boy and together, one sunny day, finding themselves outside Kate’s Great-Aunt’s house decided as a bit of a dare to investigate. They made their way through the overgrown garden and Oliver climbed up to peer through one of the upstairs windows. What he saw in the room made a memory that he never quite shook off, coming as these vivid memories often do, just before his life changed, and he moved away from Oxford. Years later Oliver and Kate meet again and start to build a life together. Kate’s family has been split into two sides for years over an ongoing dispute of inheritance of the house in Oxford but now it has been passed to Kate. With the house in a poor state of repair and Oliver at a loose end, he decides to use his time organising the repairs and renovations. Once there he finds a story, written by a woman called Sophie.
Sophie’s story is set in the 1920s where she is trying to gain access to the Bodleian Library at Oxford University, but not having anyone to write a letter to allow her entry she is turned away. So starts the beginning of my enormous sympathy for this young woman, one whose husband returned from the war a different man to the one who left. This is a woman who has a love of books, of language and of learning and yet she is tied to the house where her staff have not enough to keep them busy but go some way into bringing life into a house where husband and wife have little conversation and who sleep in separate rooms.
The link between past and present is far from clear, even to Oliver as Kate had never mentioned a Sophia, so the first mystery is how the document ended up in the house at all. But like me, he could not fail to be captivated by Sophia’s story and when the pages come to an end, he wants to know more and without Kate’s knowledge tries to find out more which means talking to the side of the family who believe the house belongs to them.
Already enthralled by the story I was especially thrilled later on when mentions of Crete, in particular, Knossos, and the renovation of the site by Arthur Evans in the early twentieth century because I visited the site on my holiday this year. We had a very knowledgeable guide Maria, and so I know that Morgan McCarthy has done her research well from the titbits that correlate perfectly to all that I learnt about the site. With many pieces of information that are lightly sprinkled throughout the book, from myths and legends to the difference between a labyrinth and a maze, battles and kings and queens, meant that this was a book that taught me some new things too without it ever feeling anything apart from the fabric of the book itself.
This book has some outstanding characters who run the gamut of emotions of humans around the world, and some of these are mirrored between past and present. Sophia has a sister, and there is sibling rivalry, there is love, there is duty and there is guilt and greed… I could go on. This isn’t a fast moving book but the language is beautiful and the writing evocative. I had one of those sad moments when I reached the very satisfying ending, where I genuinely missed the characters I’d come to know and love.
I was delighted to receive a copy of The House of Birds from the publishers Headline. This unbiased review is my thank you to them
First Published UK: 3 November 2016
Publisher: Headline
No of Pages: 448
Genre: Historical Fiction
Amazon UK
Amazon US
This does sound good Cleo. I agree dual narratives are tricky, when they work it makes for compulsive reading!
LikeLike
I adored this way more than I expected to. It is a tricky type of novel to pull off well but this had me captured from the start!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lovely review, I really think I’d love this book 😀
LikeLike
I think you might enjoy it too Annie, I was hooked right from the beginning and I did like the dodgy inheritance angle which was an unusual twist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have this one to read and your lovely review has made me want to read it even more! PS love the falling snow effect on your blog!
LikeLike
Thank you Karen, I’m sure you’ll enjoy this one!
I’d forgotten the falling snow which WordPress kindly provide so it was a lovely surprise to see it back again.
LikeLike
Sounds amazing. I wasn’t sure about this one but you may just have convinced me!
LikeLike
I really enjoyed it and although I was fairly sure from the reviews I read that I’d enjoy it, I didn’t expect it to be quite as nuanced as it turned out to be!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This sounds like a wonderful read. A book with good characters, as well as excellent writing is a joy to behold
LikeLike
It is a beautiful read with some real depth to both storylines!
LikeLike
Sounds fab, I can’t wait to read this one!
LikeLike
I hope you love it as much as I did!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have well and truly sold this to me!
LikeLike
Excellent news – I really loved it in case that didn’t come through 😉 How’s The Chemist? I gave my copy to my Son-in-Law who fancied it – he’s said a max of 3 stars so far…
LikeLike
The Chemist … it’s become a slow read but that’s me as doing too many things … it has something though midst what for me is obsessively detailed writing … reactants in place, still little sign of chemistry … too early to yield a score…. next week?
LikeLiked by 1 person
This one’s been all over Twitter which made me a little sceptical but you’ve convinced me, Cleo.
LikeLike
I read another Blogger’s review and thought it sounded good – in this case the hype has been justified 😊
LikeLike
I wish that happened all the time!
LikeLike
This sounds like a great read. I like books that use two timelines especially when this is done well.
By the way, the snow looks wonderful. This is the second blog that I have seen with that. How did you get it done?
LikeLike
The snow appeared automatically but I think I probably set it up in a previous year. I loved this book, it really had me enthralled.
LikeLike
Another for the wishlist, thanks Cleo ☺
LikeLike
Goodie, goodie – this year has thrown up some fantastic reads for me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review, this one is going on my very long TBR list. Thanks for sharing! 😊
LikeLike
Thank you – I think it deserves a spot on the TBR!
LikeLike
This does sound really good, Cleo, with my sort of story. I do like that past/present connection, and there’s just something about that post-war (WWI) era that’s fascinating. It sounds like the characters are nicely defined, too, which is always a plus for me.
LikeLike
This was one of those books populated by interesting characters and different motives in the grander sense of life itself, that always makes for enjoyable reading and the plot was handled with a certain amount of sophistication too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review. This book sounDS wonderful!
LikeLike
I really did enjoy it Abbie and thoroughly recommend it on a number of different levels!
LikeLike
This does sound good! I felt myself tearing up as I thought about all the books I’ve loved that stayed with me over the years…and I’m sure this book is one that would do the same. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
This is one of those books that will fall into that group for me as it had so many layers and lots of wonderful and distinct characters.
LikeLike
I hadn’t heard of this before, Cleo, but it sounds marvelous. Thanks for the review!
P.S. I love the graphics on this ‘comment’ form. 🙂
LikeLike
Oh I’m so pleased to have introduced a new title to you!
I fell in love with this theme on wordpress partly for the comments box!
LikeLike
I love it when characters are so well-drawn that they become like friends. Of course, I agree it’s then hard to close the book on them:) Excellent review! I’m keeping this in mind as I enjoy when an author can successfully manage a dual timeline
LikeLike
I went through a phase of reading a substantial amount of dual time-line books and this one definitely falls into one that I will remember for some time to come – incredibly evocative with clever themes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m bummed my library doesn’t have this one and it isn’t available for kindle in the US. Do you think it’s worth a purchase from Amazon third party sellers..about $9-10?
LikeLike
I am sure this will end up a book club choice next year. I do like the modern mix in historical reads. The Orphan Train was a great example.
LikeLike
I love this type of novel but only when they are done really well with both parts having something to say – I liked that our modern day narrator was a man which is unusual for this type of read too. It would make a great book club read with plenty of context about the changing role of women.
LikeLike
Looks like a fabulous read. Great review. I hope they’ll be releasing it in the U.S.
LikeLike
I think it is available in the US – I found a link for it on Amazon for kindle and hardback.
LikeLike
Hmm – your wicked plot to increase my TBR may have worked… I feel I need to know what he saw when he looked through the window…
LikeLike
If I’m honest I’m not sure you’ll love this one as much as I did but I’m not going to tell you what was through the window!
LikeLike
Spoilsport! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s still not out in the USA. I have it on my list though.
LikeLike
I often get disappointed with dual time narratives because I find the story/characters in the past more engaging than those in the present but it sounds from your review that the author may have managed to make both strands equally strong in this case.
LikeLike
This is one of the few where I was honestly as involved in the present as the past; I think the fact the protagonist in the present was a man added a different slant on proceedings.
LikeLike