
3*s
Well every year I like to explore my weird obsession with poisoners a little bit more and Dr William Palmer who was tried for the murder of his friend in 1856 by poisoning seemed a good place to travel to in this journey.
Stephen Bates has compiled his book based on the 12 day trial for poisoning his gambling partner by strychnine, one of the less common poisons to use. On 13 November 1855 Palmer’s friend John Parsons Cook was on a high, he’d managed to win, when he was lucky enough to win £3,000 at Shrewsbury races, Palmer’s horse didn’t win. That night the winner fell ill and the loser tended to him. Dr William Palmer had trained as a surgeon and at best was a small town GP but he’d given up that as a way to make money long ago and now he gambled and part-owned horses to make his living.
In order to set out the facts for us I have to commend the author for the amount of research into this case using amongst other items the newspapers of the day and the archives at both Kew and Stafford, the area in which the death of John Parsons Cook occurred. What follows was even for the day, a large number of deaths including his brother and a number of children, killed for the insurance money the prosecution ascertained. But why did Palmer kill his partner? What was the motive? Well according to the victim’s father it all hinged on his betting book, Cook hadn’t yet collected his winnings before falling ill but if that was the case, Palmer’s scheme failed because he wasn’t able to get his hands on them either.
Sadly the book itself was not written in the most sparkling of prose, it often got bogged down in the particulars losing sight somewhat of the overall story. Yes, it is non-fiction, but a good author, and editor, will keep the narrative moving along. Sadly there was repetition from the early chapters in the later ones, maybe the author was worried we’d lost track by then! The book starts well enough with a description of the day of the race, the subsequent illness and the calling of the doctor for assistance but later on we skip back to the other ‘mysterious deaths’ and a (very) long chapter on the racing world only to pick over the details of the crime again when it came to court. Perhaps a judicial editor could have made the entirety feel slightly less ‘stodgy’
That said, there was an awful lot to enjoy and many parts that I found fascinating, particularly the social history that backs up this particular crime. As always the newspaper coverage was interesting as was their horror at the number of people that turned up at the courts etc… you can always rely on the media to be the most hypocritical bunch. That might also be said about our dear friend Charles Dickens who pops up with regularity in all these Victorian trials, and hangings, bemoaning the popularity of events. It is rumoured that Inspector Bucket from Bleak House was modelled on the tenacious Charles Frederick Field who investigated the insurance angle of the crime.
Facts such as that this was the first trial moved from its home county following the Central Criminal Court Act 1856 being passed by an Act of Parliament due to the belief that the accused couldn’t possibly get a fair trial in Staffordshire; the trial was held at the Old Bailey instead, were stacked high and so on balance it was worth a read for an ardent follower of poisoners through the ages such as myself.
The Poisoner is my twelfth read in my 20 Books for Summer 2018 Challenge
First Published UK: 2014
Publisher: Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd
No of Pages: 324
Genre: Non-Fiction
Amazon UK
Amazon US
I do love a good murder.
LikeLike
It sounds quite a difficult book to read, so I’m glad you found quite a lot to enjoy and that the social history background was fascinating.
LikeLike
Oh poisoning! The French seems to have been very knowledgeable about that, I just read a ‘poison murder’, well black comedy, Antoine Laurain’s Smoking Kills which is a quirky, entertaining novella and I remember now reading another one of Gallic Books French translations The Poisoning Angel by Jean Teulé featuring a famous female serial killer from the nineteenth century:
Sorry that this one was let down somewhat, sometimes fiction portrays these stories in a more compelling and memorable way.
LikeLike
It sounds as though there’s a lot of fascinating material here, Cleo. That in itself can make a book worth the read. I’m sorry to hear it wasn’t written in a really engaging style, but I’m glad you found things to like about it, anyway. And there is something about a poisoning, isn’t there?
LikeLike
I think I would need a truly engaging style with this subject matter…but I’m glad you found much to enjoy. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
Pity about the writing and repetition – that’s always a danger with true crime which is why the good ones are such a treat. But I’m glad you felt you got enough out of it to make it worthwhile! And I’m keeping my eyes peeled for news stories about a spate of mysterious deaths somewhere in Jersey… 😉
LikeLike
That is a wicked cool cover. I do love learning about mysterious deaths, whether fake or real.
sherry @ fundinmental
LikeLike
This does sound like a fasctinating read-too bad about the writing though. I’ve noticed in a few non-fiction books that repetition is a problem-I consider this the editor’s fault more than the author though.
LikeLike